<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Web 3.0 is About Intelligence</title> <atom:link href="http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/</link> <description>Covering the social economy driving the new Web</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Recommended Reading - October 4, 2007 &#124; PR2.0</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-78025</link> <dc:creator>Recommended Reading - October 4, 2007 &#124; PR2.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:04:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-78025</guid> <description>[...] Web 3.0 is About Intelligence: I respond to Jason Calacanis&#8217; definition of Web 3.0. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 3.0 is About Intelligence: I respond to Jason Calacanis&#8217; definition of Web 3.0. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Social Graph is not Web 3.0-- bub.blicio.us</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-36536</link> <dc:creator>The Social Graph is not Web 3.0-- bub.blicio.us</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-36536</guid> <description>[...] I don&#8217;t think so. But it is an interesting discussion. It is so much more than relationships, social networks, and the ability to connect like-minded people and their documents. However, creating a standard way to describe people, the links between them and the things they create and do on the Web will only make the Web more intelligent and efficient. As I&#8217;ve said before, the future of the Web is about intelligence. It represents a shift in how people will interact with the Web and how those people, and correlating data and documents, connect through peer-to-peer sites and communities. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t think so. But it is an interesting discussion. It is so much more than relationships, social networks, and the ability to connect like-minded people and their documents. However, creating a standard way to describe people, the links between them and the things they create and do on the Web will only make the Web more intelligent and efficient. As I&#8217;ve said before, the future of the Web is about intelligence. It represents a shift in how people will interact with the Web and how those people, and correlating data and documents, connect through peer-to-peer sites and communities. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bub.blicio.us</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-28091</link> <dc:creator>bub.blicio.us</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-28091</guid> <description>[...] Web 3.0 is About Intelligence [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 3.0 is About Intelligence [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Defining Web 3.0 &#171; Public Relations Rogue</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-25512</link> <dc:creator>Defining Web 3.0 &#171; Public Relations Rogue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-25512</guid> <description>[...] Thursday, October 4th, 2007 in Strategy, Web 2.0   Like many others, my professional role requires that I try to figure out how the Web will continue to evolve. The question on my whiteboard is: &#8220;What is coming six months down the road&#8230;and what should we do about it?&#8221; Check out this post from bub.blicio.us detailing some of the latest theories about how things will turn out. I&#8217;m not enough of a tech geek to decipher which idea has the most merit, but I am intrigued by the concept of a more semantic Web - where computers and artificial intelligence would play a bigger role in the search and aggregation of content. Looking ahead, I have concerns about the nefarious impact of persistent (or worsening?) problems like spam, &#8220;Black Hat&#8221; search techniques and vitriolic personal attacks that seem to plague the Internet. Whatever the future looks like there will need to be improvements that allow users to find and use relevant information in an ever-expanding sea of content. Another important factor not mentioned prominently in the blog discussion is commerce - what tools and channels will manage to be viable businesses, and which innovative technologies will attract funding? Ultimately, however, I go back to the people rather than the technology or the markets. What are the emerging consumer trends? How are online habits changing? What products and services will be most critical in the years ahead? Starting from that point should keep me relatively close to the next iteration of the Web - I hope.       Categories [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thursday, October 4th, 2007 in Strategy, Web 2.0   Like many others, my professional role requires that I try to figure out how the Web will continue to evolve. The question on my whiteboard is: &#8220;What is coming six months down the road&#8230;and what should we do about it?&#8221; Check out this post from bub.blicio.us detailing some of the latest theories about how things will turn out. I&#8217;m not enough of a tech geek to decipher which idea has the most merit, but I am intrigued by the concept of a more semantic Web &#8211; where computers and artificial intelligence would play a bigger role in the search and aggregation of content. Looking ahead, I have concerns about the nefarious impact of persistent (or worsening?) problems like spam, &#8220;Black Hat&#8221; search techniques and vitriolic personal attacks that seem to plague the Internet. Whatever the future looks like there will need to be improvements that allow users to find and use relevant information in an ever-expanding sea of content. Another important factor not mentioned prominently in the blog discussion is commerce &#8211; what tools and channels will manage to be viable businesses, and which innovative technologies will attract funding? Ultimately, however, I go back to the people rather than the technology or the markets. What are the emerging consumer trends? How are online habits changing? What products and services will be most critical in the years ahead? Starting from that point should keep me relatively close to the next iteration of the Web &#8211; I hope.       Categories [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Calacanis: Web 3.0 is whatever I say it is - - mathewingram.com/work</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-24424</link> <dc:creator>Calacanis: Web 3.0 is whatever I say it is - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:41:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-24424</guid> <description>[...] Brian Solis has some thoughts on what Web 3.0 is at Bubblicious, and so do Alex Iskold at Adaptive Blue, Jeremy Toeman at LiveDigitally, Allan Stern at CenterNetworks, Ross Dawson and Eric Berlin at Online Media Cultist. Tags: Calacanis, mahalo, web3.0 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian Solis has some thoughts on what Web 3.0 is at Bubblicious, and so do Alex Iskold at Adaptive Blue, Jeremy Toeman at LiveDigitally, Allan Stern at CenterNetworks, Ross Dawson and Eric Berlin at Online Media Cultist. Tags: Calacanis, mahalo, web3.0 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fraser</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-24419</link> <dc:creator>Fraser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-24419</guid> <description>Great post and summary of a lot of ideas. Personally I agree with you that the discussion is healthy and valuable - it pushes us towards a definition.But we&#039;re not there yet. And today&#039;s conversation shows that we&#039;re a far way away.Which may be a good thing :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and summary of a lot of ideas. Personally I agree with you that the discussion is healthy and valuable &#8211; it pushes us towards a definition.</p><p>But we&#8217;re not there yet. And today&#8217;s conversation shows that we&#8217;re a far way away.</p><p>Which may be a good thing <img
src='http://bub.blicio.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeremy Toeman&#8217;s LIVEdigitally &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My turn: Web 3.0 will NEVER happen</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-24399</link> <dc:creator>Jeremy Toeman&#8217;s LIVEdigitally &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My turn: Web 3.0 will NEVER happen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-24399</guid> <description>[...] Some people are using terms like &#8220;semantic Web&#8221; (I like Brian&#8217;s post on this, although I disagree with him too), which I also think will not get mainstream.  First, most people don&#8217;t know what the word &#8220;semantic&#8221; means (I think it has something to do with Yom Kippur and bagels, but I may be wrong).  Second, like Jason&#8217;s Web 3.0 definition, it&#8217;s just not BIG enough. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some people are using terms like &#8220;semantic Web&#8221; (I like Brian&#8217;s post on this, although I disagree with him too), which I also think will not get mainstream.  First, most people don&#8217;t know what the word &#8220;semantic&#8221; means (I think it has something to do with Yom Kippur and bagels, but I may be wrong).  Second, like Jason&#8217;s Web 3.0 definition, it&#8217;s just not BIG enough. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Calacanis thinks in 1.0</title><link>http://bub.blicio.us/web-30-is-about-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-24389</link> <dc:creator>Jason Calacanis thinks in 1.0</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://bub.blicio.us/?p=432#comment-24389</guid> <description>[...] It&#8217;s as if Jason Calacanis thinks in 1.0. (Because if he thought in 2.0, at least someone would agree with him.) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s as if Jason Calacanis thinks in 1.0. (Because if he thought in 2.0, at least someone would agree with him.) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 330/331 objects using apc

Served from: bub.blicio.us @ 2012-02-09 23:32:11 -->
