Posts tagged as:

Google

Google Takes a Picnik

by Michelle Lentz on March 2, 2010

Google has acquired Picnik, the Seattle-based photo-editing app that lives in the cloud. I always sort of thought of Picnik as Photoshop Elements that I could access from anywhere.

I’m a bit surprised by this news, as I feel like I’ve seen Picnik everywhere in the last year, including BlogHer and CES. In fact, one of those recyclable shopping bags with a big Picnik logo is sitting right next to me.

My first thought when I heard Picnik was acquired by Google was, “What about Yahoo?”  Picnik is integrated into Yahoo’s Flickr photo-sharing app, where it offers online photo editing inside the Flickr wrapper. I use it all the time, actually. So this is interesting cross-contamination between Google and Yahoo. Obviously Google is hoping to really ramp up Picasa, and as Picasa shares so seamlessly with the other Google tools, this makes sense. If everyone I know (and several years worth of photos) wasn’t already on Flickr, I’d probably move to Picasa.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the Picnik blog post on the matter sounds more happy than sad.

What does this mean for Picnik? It means we can think BIG. Google processes petabytes of data every day, and with their worldwide infrastructure and world-class team, it is truly the best home we could have found. Under the Google roof we’ll reach more people than ever before, impacting more lives and making more photos more awesome.

What does this mean for you Picnikers? Nothing is changing right away, but Picnik now has more potential than ever before. The team that built Picnik from the grass up will continue making advanced and powerful photo-editing easier, more intuitive and more fun, so stay tuned to hear about all the cool new stuff we’re working on.

The Official Google blog also reiterates that nothing is changing. In particular, they address the Yahoo/Flickr question without mentioning it by name, saying that they’ll support “all existing Picnik partners.”

We’re not announcing any significant changes to Picnik today, though we’ll be working hard on integration and new features. As well, we’d like to continue supporting all existing Picnik partners so that users will continue to be able to add their photos from other photo sharing sites, make edits in the cloud and then save and share to all relevant networks.

__

Cheers!
Tweet Michelle @writetechnology, send her technology news at michelle[at]writetech[dot]net, visit her wine blog when you’re thirsty, and drop by her day job.

Post to Twitter

{ 2 comments }

Google and MySpace, Back in Bed for Real Time Search

by Kristen Nicole on February 22, 2010

Google and MySpace have forged a new deal, primarily for real-time search results. The search engine company has confirmed the rumors that the two companies have been in talks regarding an SEO deal, and Google will begin including MySpace content in its real time search results.

Despite issues between Google and MySpace in the past, MySpace may be able to provide some value still to the large search engine company. As Google looks to build out its real time search options, MySpace is being leveraged towards providing relevant and immediate search results for added context.

Real time search has largely turned to social media content for the past few months, highlighting social media’s ability to add another layer of context to th data we receive in the form of search results. For a given query, we can gain a certain level of instant gratification based on content published from user-generated sites such as MySpace, moving away from the validation process required by more trusted news sources. As the content from social media outlets is also rather plentiful, the ability to pull from all that time/date-stamped data has been a low-hanging fruit tempting search engines for quite some time.

Twitter helped to bring real time search into the mainstream, with Facebook and MySpace quickly following suit. For Google, the deal with MySpace means that the search engine can expand its real time search offerings, potentially improving the context behind such social searches. This goes along with many of Google’s other initiatives on the social front, including socially-oriented search results that now appear for signed in users. Along with Google Buzz and a few other social efforts, Google is clearly moving towards a more inclusive format regarding its real time search.

Whatever Google ends up doing with MySpace content for its real time search products, we’re likely to see something more useful than what other search engines have provided. Jumping head first into real time search has been something other search engines have done in the past year or so, while Google already has a founation upon which real time, socially-generated search results can be provided. Nevertheless, Google has had a harder time incorporating real time search into its established methods, especially when it comes to forging certain deals in order to access social media outlets.

Facebook has been another large database with a great deal of potential towards the real time search efforts of several search engines. For the time being, Microsoft has a better standing with Facebook regarding the use of its increasingly public interface towards real time and social search content. Google’s deal with MySpace may help overcome some of the shortcomings of its deal with Facbook, especially as it looks to stay competitive with the likes of Microsoft Bing.

For MySpace, the social network has been losing ground to Facebook for quite some time now. Having become a trend passed, MySpace has spent the past year or so rebuilding its company and its network. Returning to the basics of user-generated content and social networking, MySpace is also looking for a way to get back into the game. A real time search deal with Google may be a good outlet for MySpace, given its intentions towards its own marketing efforts.

Post to Twitter

{ 1 comment }

Google and Aardvark, Proudly Advancing Social Search?

by Kristen Nicole on February 11, 2010

More news from Google this week, as the search engine announced its plans to acquire social search engine Aardvark. The details of the acquisition have not been disclosed, though TechCrunch estimates the purchase amount at $50 million. Google is being rather tight-lipped about its plans for Aardvark as well, saying that the announcement of the two companies having signed papers agreeing to the acquisition is all the information it has to give for the time being.

As a social search engine Aardvark aims to provide fast answers based on your social network connections. The idea of relevancy is also quite important to Ardvark, as the search engine also looks to contextualize the search results so that they are useful as well as sourced from trusted friends and acquaintances. Aardvark does so by setting up a Question and Answer platform through which your social connections are leveraged towards seeking actual answers to questions.
[click to continue…]

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

Google’s Answer to Facebook and Twitter? Social Utility.

by Kristen Nicole on February 9, 2010

Google has its search engine, and it email client, and several other applications many of us are familiar with, such as the blogging platform Blogger. And Google also has a bunch of apps no one really pays attention to, or have yet to go mainstream. Then again, many of these peripheral apps don’t need to go mainstream; they’re just a small portion of what Google is trying to do on a rather large scale.

Recent changes and updates to some of Google’s more familiar apps are shedding more light on what Google may have up its sleeves, with some social integration that could enable the search king to better contend with the likes of Facebook and Twitter.

One such change has already taken effect. For Google users that remain logged into their Google accounts while searching the Google web, they will notice some socially driven recommendations at the bottom of their search page. Based on their Google friends network, which largely includes friends on their Gchat and those they share Reader items with, will appear with links to additionally relevant information.

Another upcoming change could be an update system to alert Gmail users as to new activity from their friends around their activity. This could include status updates for Gchat, or photo uploads to Picassa. It could even include social networking updates such as Twitter or Facebook updates, though current information on this possible new feature doesn’t suggest this level of integration upon launch.

The ability to create more of a social network around an email client is an idea that Google, Yahoo and others have been throwing around for a couple of years now. At first it seemed silly, but email is still a centralizing factor in most social media activity. The way in which the web is opening up for more cooperative interaction, there is plenty of opportunity for search engines and email clients to improve their core competencies based on this type of social integration.

What we’re seeing is a social inclusion of content into search results, such as real time trends powered by the likes of Twitter. Facebook, too, is beginning to open its content more to search engines, making it a potentially powerful database of socially relevant information that’s been shared within previously closed networks.

Google’s strength in competing and dually leveraging the realm of social networks is its ability to combine several aspects of its multiple applications. This has been a rather creepy incorporation of socially driven content prior to the popularity of Facebook and Twitter, but the adoption of open sharing and users’ ability to recognize the benefits of doing so has made it easier for Google to implement it’s over-arching plan.

Yahoo has already made several moves in this direction as well, incorporating social updates into its main email interface over a year ago. Pulling in updates and recommendations from some of its other applications, even the newer ones like Buzz, has given Yahoo some time to experiment with these tactics.

As Google furthers its own push into the social networking realm, it looks as though the company is going to focus on providing a utility instead of a replacement to what sites like Facebook and Twitter already offer. This leaves Google in a position of being needed, validating whatever efforts it’s currently working towards.

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

What Google and Las Vegas Have In Common

by emilygimmel on January 3, 2010

Thoughts from someone who has been on both sides of the fence:

As we gear up for CES 2010 this week, I want to point out what I think the Internet and Las Vegas have in common. Both are very special places near and dear to my heart. Everywhere I look, it amuses me with all this riff-raft about “media is dying.”  I often wonder what the hell a journalist is anyway. How is a journalist any different than a non-fiction storyteller? The fact is, we all have stories to tell. Every person on the planet is quickly being able to digital document their story as it happens.

In the past, “news” has been nothing more than what someone else, usually a wealthy high powered organization with direct ties to Wall Street and our government, would deem as important. Someone else controlling the flow of information to its audience, only producing content catering to whatever a room full of people see as important. Imagine that… until recently, the mindset of an entire city could be determined by maybe 100 or so people who produced “the news.” How do you know your priorities are the same as the man titled “News Director?” You don’t. When I write it out, it doesn’t even sound like a normal concept. I can’t imagine how nutty the dead concept will seem to future generations.

There is a little thing called Internet search that put old school media control to screeching halt. Before, humans have been forced to become products of a limited environment, living under geographic, informational, and cultural restraints. We have all been prisoners of prospective to whatever limited available media channels have allowed us to think. If perspective wasn’t greater than reality, well, America probably would not be at war right now.

Media is not dead, it is booming! Search is the new media. Access to almost anything is literally a point and click away. The key to controlling a channel is realizing that most intellectual, innovative minds don’t have time to untangle the unlimited amount of Internet streams for enriching stories relevant to their lives. That should be a media company’s role- pick out associated content relevant to your audience, create some, sort it, make it relevant.

The newspaper buyout initiative is such a huge waste of time, effort and government spending. Spend our taxes on increasing access of information to people, especially the poor, so they can learn about new opportunities and jobs. Don’t bail out large companies who are used to keeping control. Oh and create some jobs while you are it too, (that is a whole different post lol).

People want to talk about the public needing credible content they can trust. Ill tell you what is credible, a machine that generates facts with a probability of getting it right 99.999999 percent of the time. Who are you going to trust more? A police department’s data system that produces distinct data about crimes in your neighborhood, or the nightly news that tells you about a crime they think is important?  What a machine can’t do is tell an audience why they should care. That should be a media company’s (or blogger’s, or brand’s) role.

It amuses me how traditional media companies point fingers at companies such as Google and blame them for this revolution our world is enduring. To compare this to the last period of mast global economic change,  The Industrial Revolution; there was once a time in our culture where many people thought the the railroad industry would rule our country. Last time I checked, they weren’t.

A newspaper company blaming Google is like a woodcrafter blaming Henry Ford, or a village candlemaker blaming Albert Einstein. There are still plenty of wagon and candle makers, and they are probably doing just fine serving their set niche market. There will be more Googles of the world, more inventions and more game changers. Dominance does not last forever and eventually, all giants will take a fall. (ie. the current state of the auto industry).

Furthermore, what these insanely profitable technology companies cannot do is give you a relationship. If Google were a person to you, it would be the workaholic uncle always traveling the world. It may give you great resources to enhance your life, but it wont be at your backyard barbecue. New content channels should feed its audience breakfast in bed. Give them tasty tidbits that pertain to their life. Learn who they are, what they buy, where they live, and serve their every need with a silver spoon. More than anything, listen and give them an organized avenue to speak their mind.

I realize that new ideas = risk, and for many people thats why change is so difficult to implement. Risks are what allow you to grow. And I think the minute you are not growing, you are dead. I embrace change, discovery and innovation.

Las Vegas is a wonderful city that was built on fantasy, fulfilling dreams, equal opportunity, and instant gratification. To me, that is exactly what the Internet and the future of our global economy has become. Yes, just like the casinos, Google is the house and it will always win. It will always cash more than its players. So what. Learn to play game.  I am going to Double or Nothing in 2010, let’s hope luck is on my side. :)

Emily Gimmel is a TV reporter, producer, and writer with a decade of media experience. Visit www.EmilyGimmel.com for more of her thoughts and discoveries. You can also follow the self-proclaimed “Sexiness Advocate” on Twitter at @emilygimmel.

Post to Twitter

{ 1 comment }