Category Archives: Trends

I’m pretty obsessive about my Facebook settings. I’ve made sure everything is locked down tight, with my friends only able to “accidentally” share my web sites. I’ve certainly gotten rid of that “Everybody” setting. If you didn’t know by now, “Everybody” means the entire Internet.

I was reading today about how Facebook is realizing that their Privacy settings are actually pretty complex, which is probably why so few people in their late 20s or 30s bothers to set them. (Interestingly, it’s the millenials who are on top of the privacy settings.) According to an article on Wired.com, there’s a pretty good chance Facebook will be simplifying their privacy settings sometime soon.

Until then, you can use a transparency tool at ReclaimPrivacy.org to double-check your settings. Pop open the Reclaim site and drag the bookmarklet up to your browser toolbar.  Then log into Facebook and click Account > Privacy Settings. Click the bookmarklet and let the tool do the rest.

In my scan (shown above), it tried to fix the insecure bits. However, that insecure section was a checklist where I let friends share my web sites. I don’t know if it can auto-fix checklists.

Until Facebook gets their privacy settings so that everyone can understand them without first reading an instruction manual, ReclaimPrivacy.org is a free, easy way to make sure that you’re controlling exactly what information the world is learning about you.

__

Cheers!
Tweet Michelle @writetechnology, send her technology news at michelle[at]writetech[dot]net, visit her wine blog when you’re thirsty, and drop by her day job.

There’s a lot going on with consumer data right now, from electronic health records to Twitter archives in the Library of Congress. That means a lot of information could be floating around, some of it pertaining directly to you, and some of it being remotely associated with you. Regardless of what the data is, the still-growing trend towards more open sharing is creating a privacy response that will likely become bigger than anything we’ve seen in the past.

Facebook has effectively claimed the Internet, and Google is out to put its Android platform in as many places as possible. Technology and data-sharing is becoming incorporated into your doctor’s visits, your travel itineraries, your daily schedule management and your legally-binding communication for work. It’s an unavoidable progression, particularly as it effects the ability for individuals to accomplish more with the technology at hand. Making tasks easier for consumers is the trend’s largest saving grace.

And while Facebook’s data on you may be different than Google’s data on you, the in-between sharing of all this data makes up an interesting digital representation of your consumer behavior, your opinions, your daily activity, and even your whereabouts. Combined, even the information Google has on you across multiple applications and access points can offer a great deal of personal insight. Google has already found ways in which to deal with this from a company standpoint, as have all the others. But from a user perspective, that may not be enough in the end.

Even as companies such as Microsoft, Google, Apple and Twitter look to open their platforms for easier data-sharing across services and apps, they’re all competing to own as much as that information as possible. It’s monetizable now, as search information, among other things. As the mobile industry grows, that data will be further monetized as it’s given back to consumers for whatever purpose they see fit.

In some ways, this is a nice return to consumers having more control over all the data they’ve released to these numerous and growing services. Once Google Goggles is in full swing, you’ll be able to take a photo of a chair at your friend’s house, and see the stores at which it’s sold, what materials it’s made of, which of your other friends have the chair, and if the measurements fit to put the chair in your own living room.

Re-individualizing crowd-sourced data in this way has its own perks and pitfalls, which consumers, privacy advocates and corporations will have to deal with. It’s not entirely different from the mechanisms we saw with competing companies struggling to reach a point where data sharing is mutually beneficial in regards to their open platform offerings. Consumers will have to employ a similar mentality towards the data they’re indirectly sharing with each other.

Where things go from here is hard to determine, especially as some major moves are welcomed by consumers, and others are immediately rejected. It’s still necessary to build out a good ecosystem for developers to flourish, as they help drive access and demand for a given platform. Utilizing all of this in a constructive manner is a tall order for our corporate entities, but one I won’t retract any time soon.

I’ve been traveling virtually non-stop since last October. I’m okay with that – I actually love the travel, even if it does burn into my blogging time. Because of the various liquids I usually carry (which almost always includes a bottle of wine), I always check a bag. (Thank you TSA, for making it impossible to bring on wine as a carry-on. Grrr.)

I’m living for the day when I’m Delta Medallion status (that day will be soon) because at that point, my checked bags are free. Until then, I’m paying Delta $23 per bag, each way. Thankfully, it’s not yet each leg of the flight, although I wouldn’t put it past them.

On Tuesday, discount airline Spirit announced that they will now be charging for – are you ready for this? – carry-ons. Depending on several items (whether you are a member of their Frequent Flier program, whether you pre-reserve overhead space), you can be charged between $20-$45 per item that goes in an overhead bin, with the fee assessed AT THE GATE.

Now, just the logistics alone of assessing the fee at the gate is going to screw things up. Boarding a plane is often a hassle anyway. With everyone pulling out credit cards, cash, travelers cheques, etc, it’s just going to get messier. But beyond that, I’m floored they’re charging for carry-ons.

I fully admit I get frustrated watching inexperienced travelers try to force gigantic bags into the overhead. (My own overhead roller bag was specifically made for that space and slides right in, wheels first, without an issue.) I lose patience every flight as someone or another desperately shoves and pushes on a bag that just shouldn’t fit in that overhead compartment, squishing and occasionally breaking, other people’s items. Despite my loss of patience with this, I also understand it. People wouldn’t be trying to bring everything on the plane with them if it didn’t cost them $23 to check a bag (and the price goes up with each bag checked). The airlines are basically forcing people to shove their lives into an overhead bin.

You’re probably thinking that Spirit is just some tiny discount airline and none of the majors will pay attention to this. Not so. Spirit was actually the first to charge for checked bags. It’s almost like they’re the money-hungry guinea pigs. If it works, they’ve set a precedent that other airlines will have no trouble following.

It’s a horrible circle. The no-liquids security rule has forced many people to check bags and, well, pay. I’ve always felt like the airlines were taking advantage of that regulation. Now, since no one wants to pay for checked bags, people are shoving gigantic bags into the overhead. And we’re going to be charged for that?

Suitcase image used under Creative Commons from Paul Lowry.

__
Cheers!
Tweet Michelle @writetechnology, send her technology news at michelle[at]writetech[dot]net, visit her wine blog when you’re thirsty, and drop by her day job.

Back in early January, I went to CES and was completely overwhelmed. My constant joke was (and still is) that the so-called booths are big enough to have their own zip code. I took a ton of video footage, convinced I would return home and turn that into a montage that really showed everyone the absolute strangeness of CES.

I failed. I came home, switched out suitcases, and headed back out on the road again pretty soon after returning. However, I discovered a video today from my CES partner-in-crime. I spent most of the event with my friend Jason Griffey, who is Head of Library IT at the University of Tennessee Chattanooga. He’s in the midst of planning a new library building, and the place is going uber-digital. (Someday I should get him to write a post here on digital libraries.) Jason managed to put his own CES montage together and that’s what I’m dropping here.

Enjoy the oddness, the hugeness, and the just plain silly at CES 2010:

__

Cheers!
Tweet Michelle @writetechnology, send her technology news at michelle[at]writetech[dot]net, visit her wine blog when you’re thirsty, and drop by her day job.