From the category archives:

brands

Zoetica iPhone Application Launched Today

by Stephanie Schlegel on March 12, 2010

There is no limit to the quantity of iPhone apps out there. From apps that make silly noises to apps that calculate your tip on a dinner out, the selection is almost limitless. A new app, Zoetica, launched today offers a solution for those interested in the nonprofit world (an interest of mine). The Zoetica iPhone app aggregated nonprofit tech and social change blog posts, making sure the content is at your fingertips at all times. Continuing with the nonprofit theme, the application is free of cost in the iTunes store.

What makes Zoetica different than other news aggregators is that Beth Kanter, Social Media and Nonprofit expert, hand selects the blog feeds that are ultimately aggregated into the app, ensuring the user will receive the most relevant information in the space. The app was created through a partnership with AppMakr and is in itself an example of the possible use of such a tool for a nonprofit. The service makes app development possible for groups with limited budgets and limited tech skills, something many nonprofits can use. AppMakr offers different price points that allow for almost any marketing budget to include an app in the plan.

For more information about the application as well as possible uses for nonprofits, please visit Beth Kanter’s blog

Post to Twitter

{ 23 comments }

Google Buzz Kickstarts Privacy Backlash Trends for 2010

by Kristen Nicole on February 17, 2010

Google Buzz may have had a lot of expectations attached to it, as Google attempted yet again to make its existing apps more social. Unfortunately for Google, the company saw a great deal of immediate backlash from the sharing process around Google Buzz. Apparently the socialization around your email contacts isn’t something most people want automated. Fancy that.

Google was quick to respond to the backlash, changing the process for auto-follow and recommendations just days after launching Google Buzz to the public. Yet the level of backlash Google Buzz received only reminds us of consumer influence and the way in which companies need to consider consumer privacy and needs before releasing certain features and functionality.

Admittedly, I only used Google Buzz for a short while after its launch, primarily responding to comments others left on my Buzzed content. I like the concept, especially as I already use Gmail for work-related communication on a daily basis, bookmarking, scheduling, managing my Twitter, and just about everything else you can possibly think of. And I didn’t mind the auto-follow process, as I already used Google Reader and Gchat to such an extent that the people active in my Google Buzz were the people I already corresponded with on a regular enough basis.

Yet I can understand how the automated process would bother others, and even myself in the long run. Even with all the things about Google Buzz that I liked or didn’t mind, I still haven’t gone back to use it since its launch. And now that the auto-follow standards have changed, I see even less activity in my Google Buzz as it pertains to things and people I’m interested in.

I’m sure the whole “auto” thing was something Google was really banking on for the adopted use of Google Buzz, but things don’t work that easily when it comes to the social sharing of content. Many of your Gmail connections weren’t selected or approved of as “friends,” but as people you communicate with on a relatively regular basis. Perhaps it’s more difficult than we thought to create a social network around these kinds of contacts.

I expect the privacy backlash to become even more of a concern as we move forward with various social networking initiatives. Companies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Twitter are destined to push their boundaries, testing the consumer to see where the line is drawn. Consumers will, in turn, push back when they feel they’re being violated. We may never reach a happy medium, but instances such as the one we saw with Google Buzz indicates that consumers are beginning to pay attention once again to their social networking privacy standards.

Post to Twitter

{ 2 comments }

CES: Polaroid Snaps Up Pop Diva Lady Gaga

by Miiko Mentz on January 7, 2010

By Miiko Mentz

The blogosphere is buzzing this morning about the news that Polaroid has teamed with Pop Diva Lady Gaga. Last night at a press conference (and in a press release issued last night), Polaroid revealed that Lady Gaga is its new Creative Director. Polaroid plans to collaborate with Lady Gaga and introduce a specialty line later this year.

This news is definitely bubblicious, but it doesn’t surprise me and just seems like a natural next step for her as she grows her Haus of Gaga, which includes music, fashion, photography, and technology products. Last year she introduced heartbeats by Lady Gaga, in-ear headphones developed in conjunction with beats by dr. dre and Monster.

Lady Gaga was not in attendance at the press conference last night, but she will be at Polaroid’s booth today at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) being held at the Las Vegas Convention Center through Sunday.

Only time will tell if Lady Gaga can help Polaroid rise from the ashes. But one thing is for sure, she is one smart, beautiful and talented lady!

Follow me on Twitter: @MiikoMentz

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

Give It A Ponder

by Michelle Lentz on January 6, 2010

by Michelle Lentz

I attended the LG press conference at CES this morning. LG has a lot of cool things coming down the pike – everything you’ve been hearing about such as 3D and wireless/broadband ready televisions, a revised Chocolate phone, and more. But really, I could only see those things on PowerPoint slides since I haven’t yet visited their booth for a hands-on experience.

But LG also showed off an advertising campaign designed to get teenagers to think before they text. “Give it a ponder.” Ideally, the campaign will keep teenagers from sexting or spreading gossip via their mobile phones.

The Give it a Ponder site is similar to the Skittles site, where there isn’t much actual content. It links to Facebook, YouTube, and Wikipedia (where it defines cyber bullying or mobile harassment). It is the YouTube videos,starring James Lipton, that wer shown in the press conference and really caught my eye. One of them is embedded below. What do you think? Does it get a serious message across in a way that still delivers humor?

__

Cheers!
Tweet Michelle @writetechnology, send her technology news at michelle[at]writetech[dot]net, visit her wine blog when you’re thirsty, and drop by her day job.

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

First off, thank you to Brian for allowing me to do a guest post on Bub.  Last week I contacted Brian to solicit some advice on how I could get the word out about a little video I recently released on YouTube.

A contest video.

First, let me preface by saying that I’ve never entered a video contest before. The opportunity cost just didn’t make sense – taking time out from other work to essentially create a free commercial for someone and then shamelessly self-promote it in hopes of winning a gift certificate (?) Didn’t seem worth it.

Then I came across this contest sponsored by Lash Allure MD. There’s a $100,000 pot at stake – which, needless to say, is much larger than most other online video contest winnings. Immediately, my mind was racing about the web content I could fund with 100k. No more brand or studio pitches in 2010? I’d be in heaven.

The best part (or, in some cases, the worst)? The winner is NOT chosen based on a subjective judging process. The system is clear: the person with the most “votes” wins. Each YouTube star rating counts as one vote, and one comment, per user, per day, counts as a vote. Simple, quantifiable. And yet, a little unfair for those who don’t have massive YouTube followings.

So I decided to enter. First with my own video, and then after realizing that I would never win on my own regards, I teamed up Olga Kay, a YouTuber with about 70,000 subscribers. To incentivise people to help, we decided to offer up $10,000 of the prize money to dedicated commenters. Every day for 20 days, we pose a new question in the annotation on the video. Answer the question, and you could win $500. $500 to twenty people = $10,000 total giveaway.

Yes, this was our screengrab. I know, I know.

Shameless.

It’s now Dec. 12th – only 8 days before the contest ends. We are currently in 2nd place, behind a witty YouTube blogger with a big following, but with the a little nudge here and there from the right people, we could definitely win the grand prize.

We’ve received several little endorsements from friends – including tweets from Ryan Higa and Dave Days – and brought on a new, third partner – Phil DeFranco.

We are asking for your help because this isn’t about making money to put in a savings account. It’s a viral contest, and as such, Olga, Phil and I want to put that money toward advancing our own web content initiatives.  Not to mention that we would still give away $10k (and a few other little surprises) to our commenters.

It’s hard for me to ask any favors of anyone, but in this case, I’m swallowing my pride.

So, please, if you have a chance today (and for the next 8 days) – rate and comment this video here —> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=df2_CZCfAaE – and RT if you can :-)

Oh, and for all of you business owners out there looking to hold promotional video contests – take a cue from Lash Allure MD. By judging a video contest on ratings and comments, rather than on the video content itself, the company is benefiting from the self-promotional efforts of people like me as well as the engagement and interaction of potential customers who are rating/commenting on the videos. Smart.

Post to Twitter

{ 2 comments }